Orlowsky: Dekok: In any case, prototypes are a legacy concept that doesn’t align either with the mental model of OOP programmers, *or* the actual execution model of modern JS engines.
Daughters: Profsimm: again, you’re free to think whatever about the language. Just don’t 1 attack other people; 2 spread misinformation about the language. It isn’t much to ask for
Standing: Profsimm: again, don’t spread misinformation.
Knickrehm: Dekok: you’re putting on a pedestal an abstraction which is kept entirely for BC and is present nowhere except in a spec.
Fuemmeler: Profsimm: if you don’t want to learn, that’s fine. But spreading misinformation is not acceptable
Falcon: Dekok: I don’t spread misinformation, V8 and other runtimes compile objects into cl***es
Ardd: Profsimm: have you ever tried following es-discuss? Or talking to the design committee in ES?
Formaggioni: Profsimm: they do not.
Sissell: Profsimm: “hidden cl***es” are not “cl***-based OO”
Rosinski: Two entirely different things.
Siembida: Dekok: hidden cl***es are cl***es, by your own definition up there.
Mildrum: Dekok: all objects are based on a cl***.
Hesselman: Profsimm: they’re not. You can also read about them here: http://bibliography.selflanguage.org/implementation.html
Creekbaum: Profsimm: are functions just a bunch of statements and a “jmp”?
Andrulis: Wernert, what am I doing wrong here? http://jsfiddle.net/4k34hmea/
Castellanos: Something about call stack
Ends: Dekok: add in a stack-frame, and I’ll probably say yes
Feazell: It should eventually end, no?
Dugar: Oh great, you’re linking random blog posts who don’t even have any credibility in what they’re talking about. What a good argument! I am now thoroughly convinced
Trousdale: Dekok: I don’t care if you’re convinced. You’re some unemployed basement idiot that’s here 24/7, ready to argue with anyone about prototypes.
Heagy: Profsimm: again, stop attacking people.
Correl: Dekok, I don’t give a damn. If you’re butt-hurt, ban. It’ll make you feel better for a minute.
Marguez: Profsimm: him being here 24/7 to help people is nice, not idiocy
Moe: For me it doesn’t matter.
Servis: You’re toxic to this channel.
Wernert: Reductive reasoning and ad hominem. another day in Kimpel!
Haymer: This is a feisty channel and no mistake
Roker: Meh, he must be some random kid
Nottage: Well, she, in that case. But whatever
Trythall: Dekok: ah, good to meet :v
Laycock: Fixed it! http://jsfiddle.net/4k34hmea/1/
Wernert: Frogdr: it’s generally better to put the escape clauses first, like: if evalInt === 0 return true; if evalInt === 1 return false;
Westmark: Https://gist.github.com/anonymous/affdf2a240655f007646 I’m trying have the While loop on line 2 prevent the user from typing anything other than the set strings. Even when a string is inputed exactly, the while loop continues infinitely. How can I stop the while loop once the parameters are true?