Seems like it still.

 
Meneus: You’re never actually leaving promise-land, async/await is just a way to pretend like you are

Leverson: Meneus, but what await yields can be any thenable, or not?

Kerbel: Hendershott: https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v4.0.0/

Bohac: Does not now track v8’s version number?

Hobson: But like 2 weeks ago I read somthing that said io.js wasn’t going to be fully? merged until next april or somehting

Bohac: S/does not/does node/ even

Kerbel: Meneus: https://babeljs.io/repl/#?experimental=true&evaluate=true&loose=true&spec=false&code=function%20foo%20%7B%0A%20%20return%20new%20Promisefunctionresolve%2C%20reject%7B%0A%20%20%20%20resolve’foo’%3B%0A%20%20%7D%0A%7D%0A%0Avar%20val%20%3D%20await%20foo%3B

Kerbel: Cut off? hrm it’s pretty short, showed likei t made it through here

Kerbel: Http://pastie.org/10406132

Kerbel: I thought you could do something like this

Leverson: Kerbel, oh!, yeah, I don’t think so

Kerbel: But lets say I wrap this entire thing in an “async iife”, even that would be no good?

Leverson: Await is basically a yield inside a generator

Leverson: Async creates a generator that eventually returns a promise

Meneus: Kerbel: yeah, that wouldn’t work

Leverson: Kerbel, if you wrap it it should be good, yeah

Poltorak: Sooooo, sounds like they merged it all

Meneus: As Leverson said, async/await is just more sugar for a spawn function/coroutine

Meneus: Leverson: I believe it will work with any thenable, yes

Kobis: Hendershott, there are some practical issues still left, like all native addons have to updated to compile with never V8 API

Imig: I actually like that, weeds out unmaintained stuff

Kerbel: Http://bit.ly/1KCP8SE

Kerbel: So why not just default the global scope to “async”?

Leverson: Kerbel, because everything would have to be technically inside a generator.

Meneus: Right, it’s smoke and mirrors

Meneus: If you did that, you’d basically be tellign the event loop not to do anything until the promise in question is resolved

Meneus: IE you’d be making it sync for real

Kerbel: Alright. I still don’t really get the underlying bits but I will one day

Kerbel: Now what about .catch

Kerbel: How does that fit into await

Kerbel: If I reject where does it go

Meneus: Well, basically you get to use try/catch again

Meneus: Though because of the chainability of promises you could await yourPromise.catchhandleIt to catch any general errors, to keep the number of try/catch blocks to a minimum

Leverson: Try.catch basically calls throw on the generator

Leverson: And bubbles the error

Leverson: Async/await is similar to Haskell’s do notation

Meneus: It can turn into a huge mess though if you just let it bubble not unlike with long promise chains

Kerbel: In my babel test it just printed to console

Leverson: In fact, async/await could be made more general to make it work with other monads, not just Promise

Kerbel: Not sure if that’s a babel thing or chrome doing that tho

Leverson: Do function {var a = draw m}

Meneus: Well that’s kinda what async generators will do

Leverson: Something like that for example

Meneus: Async generators will be able to work with, and yield, Observables

Meneus: At least, last time I looked at the spec that’s what they’d do

Meneus: Dunno if babel has implemented those yet though

Kerbel: Meneus: http://bit.ly/1Nopku1

Kerbel: Seems like it still executes in the same order expected, I don’t understand what you meant by “nothing would happen until promise resolves”