The child selectors might.

 
Hoag: Bprompt: that worked perfectly, thanks! Any idea on the logo issue?

Marana: Helpmeplease: logo issue? dunno what that is

Maryott: Bprompt: see how the logo is in the middle of the picture? I need to have it to the left of the screen, maybe in the black area, that scrolls with the menu

Cruey: Bprompt: Here’s what I’ve done now http://jsfiddle.net/skinux/723hpozu/

Muchow: Helpmeplease: all I can think of, offhand is positioning

Wethington: Well that’s interesting. I took out MY CSS, put back app.css WITHOUT the official Bootstrap files and .content is now displaying a bit more toward center but not center.

Massini: Bprompt: how do i mess with the positioning?

Heerkes: Helpmeplease: set .site-branding with – position: relative – so it becomes the “normal flow” parent for any positioned children, and then set the a with the image, to – position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;

Kleinhenz: Bprompt: Now I’m seeing what I want on JSFiddle USING Bootstrap and app.css, while local has some change but not what I want.

Pignone: Bprompt: so .site-branding is only the logo?

Aslett: Helpmeplease: is the containing element

Farber: I wanted to ask, is it possible to use a framework — such as materialize — only on an isolated part of the site?

Palmerton: Like encapsulate it in a div or likewise?

Presho: Bprompt: here is what the branding has now: http://pastebin.com/j7DYtLnV

Delmuro: Wiherek: using an iframe maybe =, but otherwise, that’d defeat the idea of using a framework

Semler: Where do I need to put ‘position: absolute’

Suet: Wiherek: if you need to do that, that means you don’t need a framework

Pelletiu: I want to include a component into an app

Gugel: And I want to use materialize or actually angular material

Geitz: But I dont want the generic styles to apply to all the elements.

Glauser: Wiherek: mashups work very well in js, due to namespace scoping, css doesn’t have lexical scoping per se, so mashups with frameworks will not work

Bideaux: Well, is js or other languages, so long there’s lexical scoping and namespaces

Mashek: Well, I think I could just add a container css cl*** in front of every single style block, right?

Glenny: A { text-decoration: underline whatever… }

Kusek: Bprompt: here is what the branding has now: http://pastebin.com/j7DYtLnV ; Where do I put the code you gave me?

Altobell: Wiherek: could, yes, that’s css way of scoping, which will require indexing every member in that scope to be prefixed by that cl***/id in the selector :

Guisbert: Helpmeplease: set .site-branding with – position: relative – so it becomes the “normal flow” parent for any positioned children, and then set the a with the image, to – position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;

Blassingame: Wiherek: which is insane :P, if you want a mashup in css

Scalet: Yeah I saw that bprompt, but in the PasteBin I sent, it doesnt show me where to put those

Aronowitz: Bprompt: why is that insane?

Simank: It can easily be done by awk, or even in Sublime with find/replace

Crayford: Well… maybe not that easily.

Burnstein: Wiherek: well, I gather an insane person would wonder why, because he/she is already at that stop =, think about it some, prefixing every entry with that, and then trying to disentangle it from other selectors from other frameworks?

Reinitz: Yea it does seem somewhat against the stream

Gwaltney: Wiherek: as far as awk or sublime, is not an editor issue, is a parsing rules issue, the editor will do whatever, will even let you write Java in a css selector, doesn’t mean it’s going to p****

Pert: No, that’s just a matter of the right rule

Crist: Like, containers, like body etc.

Mahnke: The child selectors might rely on rules that are set for parents