Kloeck: AllgoodAtTaoti: yes
Brissett: Bprompt, feels like it though D:
Dehaven: AllgoodAtTaoti: should be ::before, but yes
Ruckey: Ty, just needed a sanity check
Yosten: AllgoodAtTaoti: check. waiting.waiting. “fail”
Gaete: Ugh, no worries even if not
Wendzel: I’m back end and I got tossed this task, if i’m dealing with these psudeo selectors who ever gets this scss next is gonna have a rough time
Panfil: Musk: my “yellow parts”? which one are those?
Medalion: Bprompt, i meant the whole background
Schroeppel: Musk: so, you want to make html clickable?
Niss: If you look at the fiddle. i want .wallpaper to be a fix element behind other elements but that .wallpaper has an anchor in it which needs to be clickable.
Cazaree: Musk: got a picture of what you’re trying to do?
Klingensmith: Just look any Wallpaper Ad. its basicly the samething
Dunstan: Musk: I’d rather have the picture :
Skillings: Bprompt, here is an example of a wallpaper ad : https://m2.behance.net/rendition/pm/947120/disp/3ed93493af4a2f0e0aeb65894f3136f7.jpg
Stewert: Musk wallpaper ads are going the way of myspace
Lanclos: Bango2, i know but people still buy for those :
Reckleben: Ok so i have this stupid drupal markup ew ew ew https://gist.github.com/allgood2386/ee255dab79ae760c10cc
Haushalter: All i’m trying to figure out is how to select the first instance of each cl*** so: committeekey-1, then in another rule I would find the first instance of committeekey-3, then committeekey-10 etc. Any ideas, this really isn’t my wheelhouse and I’m struggleing to get nth-of-type and all these pseudo selectors working.
Iredale: AllgoodAtTaoti JS is your friend
Iredale: You can’t tell CSS something it doesn’t know
Flett: Lukia: ugh that’s waht I’m seeing around? so the first one shows up then not the second, is that’s what going on here http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6402330/targeting-the-first-cl***-instance-on-a-page-with-css
Monsegur: Where he says the first answer is wrong?
Losinski: So it’s Find me the first element with each cl*** name that also has the showreel cl*** applied.
Pangallo: So it’s basically choosing my div that’s also matches the cl***?
Chladek: I’m trying to figure out the best way to implement this: http://i.imgur.com/7Ogqjar.png
Vanwingerden: Each of the 3 ‘sections’ is a div, and they have a container div
Eddins: Some_Person: you could do that a couple of different ways. But what would happen at narrow viewport widths?
Lehmkuhl: Eddins: What we have now is already not exactly usable at narrow widths anyway
Eddins: Could be a good opportunity to design “mobile first” then?
Jukich: In any case, that’s not my goal here
Selzler: My goal is to fix a bug where the 2 bottom panels expand more than the parent div
Huit: Because they have height set to 100% and it doesn’t take into account the doohickey at the top
Eddins: That’s because they are not 100% height
Eddins: They need to be 100% – the doohicky
Whyte: Right, but hardcoding the size of the doohickey doesn’t seem ideal
Minucci: I suppose I could throw something together so I can give you a link; I’m not able to link you to the actual page
Eddins: Use one of these options :
Mothershead: I have an element for which if I set “display: inline-block;” it shrinks and if I set “display: inline;” or “display: block;” it fells the parent container. Can anyone explain this behavior?
Eddins: Display: block; elements will fill the parent width. That’s what they do. Inline elements do not, however