Schehl: Extreminador: tables kinda went through the same in the 90’s btw, out of necessity, one started using tables for layout, next thing you know, they were used for anything and everything, even for salads
Neid: Quill: it’s been a long and terrible time dealing with that kind of thing. i’ve had to teach devs to unlearn that kind of thing where i work
Savelli: Bprompt: I’m glad it’s over. Misuse of tables were a chronic developer abuse.
Pelligrino: Bprompt, I sadly still use tables for one site I work on.
Nurre: It’s amazing how people want to build a skysc****r and they can’t even dig a hole in the dirt
Humphers: But bprompt think evrething is usefull, the user need to see with one suites better for him
Reio: Bprompt: however bearing in mind there was no alternative at the time
Cardosa: For complex page layouts
Tomspon: But in order to do it he need’s to learn a bit of evrething to decide with is best and with he need to skill up not sure if it’s the correct word to use
Quill: Tinystoat tell me about it, we inherit built websites with a lot of ****
Quill: And people want to pay us to fix it
Ridner: Tinystoat: well then, you just need to install Bootstrap for that, and apply the .col-xs-24 with the float: right
Vallegos: Quill: isn’t that a good thing?
Quill: Couple times I just have rebuilt them
Wilchek: Quill: been there, done that lol
Quill: Derstrom the fixing is more time consuming than rebuilt it from scratch
Spera: Just start from scratch, it’s so much quicker
Reents: Quill: i used to work for a ****ty company that fixed that kind of thing. the stress made me go bald and i got lucky later and found myself in a strong best practice company after that but before that oh hell
Sepulveda: Yes, I know, I am in the midst of a huge project and we decided it would be more time-effective to just rebuild it from scratch
Quill: Tinystoat I’m trying to follow that path
Quill: Before I get bald, lol
Pohlson: No framework. just vanilla and you’re done in 1 hour sheesh
Gammond: Derstrom: yeap, in the case of tables, yes, back in html3.2 there was no alternative, thus out of necessity it had to be used for layout, no excuse after that when css 1.0 came out thoguh
Kregger: Quill: yes please don’t lose your hair it doesn’t come back :
Monsma: Tables was deprecated for layout in 1997 but i still see people in here with that kind of thing.
Sarzynski: That’s nearly 20 years ago
Quill: Tinystoat we have three years old sites in our portfolio
Svay: I bet they’re joomla! 😀
Quill: Static, built with dreamweaver
Scow: Bprompt: well there’s a lot of factors as to why tables were still used after CSS 1 was standardised. some fairly valid justifications; browser support being one
Passantino: Is flex supported by the majority of the browsers ?
Crumpacker: Derstrom: the reason tables are still used is because they are used to mark up tabular data
Ackins: Derstrom: yeah, you had to provide legacy for a bit, yes
Marcello: I have boiled down my question to simple html/css http://stackoverflow.com/questions/33711276/
Dancer: Extreminador: yes look at css tricks article came out recently
Lingardo: Crumpacker: we are not talking about using tables to hold tabular data
Finnicum: Crumpacker: it’s a long rant in here about the bad old days of table layout
Schlabs: By “autistic” brain won’t give up. I just feel stupid when I can’t do a simple layout with css
Bossier: Guess it’ is them hehehe
Geibel: Knobo1: all takes time
Splain: I have built a few css layouts, but I tend to use a grid framework of some type. I can’t use flexbox yet :/
Crumpacker: Derstrom, tinystoat: oh, sorry :p