Petrilli: Ye i thought it’s only accross channels of active network
Veneman: T-Rex_: i suspect nothing is going to work with that markup: you have 24 units of width when there should only be 12. those aren’t columns, they’re accidents
Veneman: Then you won’t get the effect you desire. the markup and style are doing exactly what they’re supposed to: they’re wrapping
Bouleris: I know mate just wanted to hear it from someone who is a pro
Veneman: Hooray! another waste of my time!
Roehler: Veneman: I copied what you suggested.
Denio: I enjoy wasting your time
Heimann: Thanks for the speedy answers again mate
Gulan: Still same: http://jsfiddle.net/ht8ovwvt/2/
Stecklair: What are you trying to achieve undrinkablesoup
Veneman: Undrinkablesoup: http://jsfiddle.net/ht8ovwvt/3/
Reddish: Veneman: It shows the boxes inside the table.
Veneman: Undrinkablesoup: so move them. you’re using position: absolute
Seppa: Undrinkablesoup # you’re going to have to learn at least something before you can actually use the advice from here, Resources to help you get started: http://hashcss.com/schools/
Armout: Veneman: http://jsfiddle.net/ht8ovwvt/4/
Densmore: Notice the problem now?
Kounthapanya: When I have it hovering so it shows up, I move the cursor left, and then it disappears.
Durtschi: Unless it’s exactly to the border.
Perich: Which means it has to have a pixed width, no?
Burningham: Also, I have past experiences with position: relative; causes all sorts of weird glitches, but I hope it won’t this time.
Nollman: But i thought all elements in the dom are natively positioned relativel
Veneman: Position: relative does exactly what it says it does
Veneman: T-Rex_: no. static is the default position
Widera: T-Rex_, CSS ‘position’ property: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#propdef-position
Romines: See another thing learned!
Veneman: Undrinkablesoup: yes. because if you leave the td:first-child:hover, the display: block doesn’t apply anymore. this is usually why doing things like this in css is a pain in the ***
Barocio: How would you absolutely-position an element to the body?
Weinstock: Like fixed but where it’s not bound to the viewport, just the body
Castanon: Wait wait i know this one body position relative and element position absolute
Bobzien: But JS is even more of a pain.
Ligons: Why JS is such a beautifull language
Markoff: Http://codepen.io/chtsrl/pen/epJjOd trying to feet these 4 green textboxes side one side but I think I am confusing with width calculation
Door: Ive been banging my head trying to figure out why there is a gap in the top of this page http://126.96.36.199/~wiannet/hopeforfree/
Galm: I found this .orbit-wrapper.transparent-header div.slider-nav span, .orbit-wrapper.transparent-header article
Veneman: Wowk: they’re only 90px less than the full width of their parent. width: 100% isn’t about the content of the element
Fenstermacher: Btw why is bootstrap so ****ty when it comes to equalising heights
Veneman: T-Rex_: regarding your problem? because you’re doing your markup wrong. and for ****’s sake stop using your enter key. type an entire sentence
Allers: Also i disagree with the wrong markup, i think of it using bootstraps functionality but in my own way